“The ChatGPT Lawyer”
-
The Case
A prototypical case—two parties and an agreement that doesn’t warrant overpriced attorney involvement.
-
The Conflict
One party breaches, the other sues, and a disparity in legal power leads to a grave injustice.
-
The Connection
Overpriced attorney unsuccessfully tries to reverse injustice using AI and the irony ignites a vision.
The Point
Ironically, the instrument of the downfall is the tool that could’ve preempted it. Had AI been been utilized from the beginning—to draft the contract, comprehend post-breach rights, or grasp the courts intricacies—justice could have prevailed.
In an age dominated by technology, using AI wisely will tip the scales of justice.